The liberal elites and the fake media are working feverishly to cover up the BIG LIE.
Diana West wrote yesterday about how the jackal media and hyena politicians are tearing apart all opponents of the coup that put the Biden-Harris gang in power.
The far-left power structure must eliminate all voices that can threaten it BIG LIE. You are no longer allowed to question the historic fraud that set up a dementia patient and his unpopular California sidekick who refused to campaign in the White House.
But millions of Americans refuse to buy this historic lie.
TREND: President Trump Prepares ‘Enemy List’ For Dirtbag Republicans In Primary – Goes Forward With Plans To Create ‘Patriot Party’ For The People
Law professor Davide K. Clements recently posted a rebuttal video refuting the BIG LIE, stating that there was no evidence of voter fraud in the 2020 election.
As The Gateway Pundit has reported for months, the fraud was significant and historic.
Professor Clements’ video already has 121,000 views.
Via LifeSite News:
A professor of business law at New Mexico State University (NMSU) said that anyone who suggests that there is “no evidence” of massive voter fraud in the November presidential election does not know what they are talking about. .
Professor David K. Clements posted a provocative video in response to a letter sent to the entire NMSU faculty by Dr John Floros, the president of the university. Clements described the letter as “regurgitating” the story “in the media” of the election and the January 6 violence in the US capital.
While broadly addressing many questions on these topics, he was very specific about his own personal investigation into the issue of voter fraud.
For those who believe “there’s no proof, you don’t know what you’re talking about,” he said. “I have reviewed hours and hours of public hearings. I have read almost all of the lawsuits that exist. Most of them were dismissed for reasons of legal proceedings. “
These lawsuits, he said, were dismissed due to a lack of legal standing. The “general argument” that was made in these cases, he said, “was that because it was general prejudice”, then “you don’t have standing because your prejudice must be particular. It is not because there is no proof. There is evidence, ”said the professor.
“In fact, I am in possession of 574 pages of affidavits under oath, of forensic reports, all of which would make their way to court based on the rules of evidence in federal or state court. The fact that the evidence has not been heard here by these courts “should not be confused with” this idea that there is no evidence, “Clements argued.