in

Peoples Law of 2021 : Democrats push for bill that requires all states to count ballots received 10 days after an election

Long before the coronavirus pandemic in China – Democrats were pushing postal voting, ballot collection and other ploys to fight their way to power.

In May 2020, Pelosi was already talking about postal voting in 2020 due to the coronavirus.

But it goes back even further than that.
Democrats pushed back postal voting legislation in January 2019!

Dienekes’ Place reported:

Long before crippling our economy, killing small businesses and locking everyone in their homes, Democrats pushed postal voting. Here is the proof…

In January 2019, a year before Americans heard of COVID19, Democrats in Washington introduced the Vote By Mail Act of 2019 – a bill to “allow all eligible voters to vote by mail in elections federal ”.

You can read it here.

Regardless of what the Democrats say today, their “Vote By Mail” program has nothing to do with the Chinese virus, and all to do with power.

And it wasn’t just Democratic senators who pushed for new vote theft legislation.

The Pelosi Democrats in their first move after taking control of the US House was to pass HR 1 the “For the People Act”.

The bill allowed Democrats to collect ballots from seniors in nursing homes, a criminal act in most states, and allowed foreigners to vote in U.S. elections.

And now this …
New bill introduced by House Democrats called the “People’s Law of 2021” will ensure Democrats can count the ballots for days and days after an election until they have enough of votes to win.

Democrats must cheat to win.
We all know that.

Trending Politics reported:

Catch this? In other words, if states want to count ballots received 10 or more days after polling day, Congress won’t be allowed to stop them from doing so.

Keep in mind that the reason so many key battlefield states changed their rules ahead of the November 3 election was that an army of lawyers and activist groups petitioned the leaders of the State and state courts in the months leading up to the November 3 elections to change them. in a way that would disadvantage the outgoing President, then President Donald Trump.

A week after the November election, constitutional scholar, author and radio host Mark Levin explained this during a segment on Fox News’ Sean Hannity:

Why did it take until 2 a.m. or 3 a.m. after the 2016 election to find out who’s the winner, but we’re still counting the votes today? Now why were the rules changed by Democrats? Because they believe in good government? Because they wanted to help the Republicans? No. They set the rules to help Democrats. This is why Alito and hopefully four other justices say to separate these votes, these were made by the Pennsylvania State Supreme Court in violation of the United States Federal Constitution.

Look, I have a lot more to say, but just let me say this before I waste my time. There is more evidence of electoral fraud than there is evidence of Russian collusion. So those who keep saying, let’s see the evidence, where the hell have you been for the past four years? You were nowhere. Democrats want to vote earlier and count later and later.

Read the rest here.

Newspaper publishes scientifically flawed study claiming repairs would save blacks from coronavirus – Dateway

Prince William ‘sad and shocked’ by Harry against the Queen