in ,

The myth of “asymptomatic cases”

This is not news, but it has been scientifically confirmed by a study of nearly 10 million people in Wuhan, China.

The study concludes what is called “Asymptomatic cases”Are extremely rare if it occurs at all, they test negative for ‘covid’, they are not sick, they are not contagious and so cannot spread the disease and infect others.

So, wWhy then do you wear masks, you are told to stay at home, are you the victim of closures, forced to close your business, in the most fascist countries, are you the victim of curfew, and why this program of rushed “vaccination”?

The study was published a month ago and is available to read here: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-020-19802-w

and for download, here:

To summarize:

  • 9,899,828 PEOPLE TESTED IN WUHAN PROVINCE OF CHINA
  • 300 “ ASYMPTOMATIC CASES ” IN 9,899,828 PEOPLE (0.00303%)
  • ALL “ ASYMPTOMATIC CASES ” TESTED NEGATIVE FOR SARS-COV-2
  • ZERO “ ASYMPTOMATIC CASES ” FOUND ILL
  • AND NO “ ASYMPTOMATIC CASES ” WERE INFECTIOUS

Once again, why the lockdowns, the masks, the curfews, the economic, cultural and social destruction, the blackmail of “vaccinations”?

Do people still think they are doing this for their health and safety?

Extracts from the study:

“Nucleic acid on a city scale screening for SARS-CoV-2 infection in Wuhan recruited nearly 10 million people (…) The detection rate of asymptomatic positive cases was very low, and THERE WAS NO EVIDENCE OF TRANSMISSION OF POSITIVE ASYMPTOMATIC PEOPLE TO TRACED CONTACTS.

“A total of 1,174 close contacts of asymptomatic cases were traced, and they all tested negative for COVID-19.

ALL CONTACTS CLOSED OF THE ASYMPTOMATIC POSITIVE CASES TESTED NEGATIVE, INDICATING THAT THE ASYMPTOMATIC POSITIVE CASES DETECTED IN THIS STUDY WERE NOT LIKELY TO BE INFECTIOUS. “

IN SUMMARY, the detection rate of asymptomatic positive cases in Wuhan after the lockdown was very low and THERE IS NO EVIDENCE THAT POSITIVE ASYMPTOMATIC CASES IDENTIFIED WERE INFECTIOUS. “

in addition

Laboratory virus cultures and existing genetic studies 9,10 have shown that the virulence of the SARS-CoV-2 virus can weaken over time and that the newly infected people were more likely to be asymptomatic and with a lower viral load than those infected earlier.

Additional information is available for this article at https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-020-19802-w

This study has been widely disseminated on the internet in recent months, except of course by the mainstream media which are, as we know, heavily subsidized by governments, the pharmaceutical industry, billionaire “ foundations ” (Gates ), and majority controlled by a handful of companies that have been pushing for the current ‘covid’ panic agenda since day one.

Here are some articles and reviews that corroborate what real science has found:

Revisited asymptomatic spread

Conclusion of the article:

With strong evidence that asymptomatic spread is absurd, we must ask ourselves: who makes the decisions and why? Again, this brings me back to the metaphor of the fog. We are all faced with confusion and uncertainty about the precise relationship between the strategies and goals of the panoply of regulations and stringency all around us. Even the rationale has become elusive – if not refuted – as frustration and disorientation has displaced what we vaguely remember as the clarity and rationality of everyday life.

Asymptomatic transmission of COVID-19 has not occurred at all, study of 10 million finds

Only 300 asymptomatic cases in the study of nearly 10 million were discovered, and none of those tested positive for COVID-19.

ANALYSIS

WUHAN, China, December 23, 2020 (LifeSiteNews) – A study of nearly 10 million people in Wuhan, China found that the asymptomatic spread of COVID-19 did not occur at all, so undermining the need for lockdowns, which are based on the premise that the virus is unintentionally spread by infectious and asymptomatic people.

Published in November in the scientific journal Nature Communications, the paper was compiled by 19 scientists, mainly from Huazhong University of Science and Technology in Wuhan, but also scientific institutions across China as well as in the UK and Australia. He focused on the residents of Wuhan, zero point for COVID-19, where 9,899,828 people participated in a screening program between May 14 and June 1, which provided clear results as to the possibility of asymptomatic transmission of the virus.

Asymptomatic transmission has been the underlying rationale for lockdowns imposed around the world. The most recent guidelines from the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) still state that the virus “can be spread by people who do not have symptoms.” In fact, the CDC has claimed that asymptomatic people “are responsible for over 50% of transmissions.”

CONCLUSION:
“We keep hearing how we should follow science,” Tucker added. “The claim is exhausted now. We know what is really going on. “

He closed his comment with the question: “With strong evidence that asymptomatic spread is absurd, we must ask ourselves: Who makes the decisions and why? “

Giant study debunks myth of asymptomatic spread of COVID

‘UN Agenda 2030’, the ‘big reset’, ‘one world government’, the new world order ‘, ALREADY VIEWED…

The why is explained below:

There is no scientific data to corroborate the asymptomatic spread of COVID-19. This myth was created and promoted by technocratic scientists to control populations and generate social engineering results, including the great WEF reset.. ⁃ TN Editor

New study on asymptomatic transmission of COVID not only proves it doesn’t happen this proves that the panic promoted by the political class was aimed at controlling populations.

In total contradiction to the popular narrative used by Democratic politicians and governors across the United States, a new study of 10 million people in Wuhan, China – the zero point for the COVID virus, has shown that asymptomatic spread of COVID does not occur, overriding all reasoning for business closures and lockdowns.

In June 2020, Dr Maria Van Kerkhove, head of the Emerging Diseases and Zoonoses Unit at the World Health Organization, publicly declared that she doubted the rhetoric put forward by politicians on asymptomatic transmission.

The myth of the “asymptomatic carrier”

https://bengarrison.com/

It stuck in my brain and reminded me of the article published in the Chinese Journal of Epidemiology (2020, Volume 41 (4): 485-488 (English translation here), lead author Zhuang Guihua, who stated that among asymptomatic carriers the false positive rate for the RT-PCR test was 80.33%. If you think along the same lines as me, you might see that what I suspect is that all these asymptomatic carriers are nothing more than false positives, and that the test is disease, which is not caused by a new, new and dangerous virus.

I urge you to read Zhuang’s diary, as it is accessible to everyday people. The approach is mathematical and you might think that as a retired CPA I have some insight into this area. Believe me, no. My CPA colleagues might say otherwise, but I have spent my career doing arithmetic, not math. I was still able to grab the gist of the paper, as with the following from page 8 (of 9)):

The types of people targeted for screening have also been broadened, which will undoubtedly lead to more and more “asymptomatic infections” being reported. Based on the information currently available, this study estimates the reasonable range of changes in related indicators and infers the proportion of false positives in positive screening measures among close contacts of the case. This study found that when the infection rate and the sensitivity and specificity of close contacts were considered the most likely values, the positive predictive value was only 19.67%. Conversely, the proportion of false positives in the positive results was 80.33%.

Conclusion of the article:

Asymptomatic transmission ”is a myth caused by a faulty test, nothing more. I highly recommend anyone reading this under all circumstances to avoid both the Covid-19 RT-PCR test and the associated antibody test. The latter is less dangerous but will give nothing as useful information for as much as 150 $. The former is dangerous and costs you personal freedom for no valid scientific reason.

Still to come, vaccination, also fraudulent. I agree with James Corbett, not linked here but who said in one of his reports on Bill Gates this when the guy finally dies, someone will have to drive a stake in his heart to make sure he stays dead.

The faster the better

Giant peer-reviewed study debunks myth of asymptomatic spread of COVID

New study of 10 million Chinese reveals asymptomatic spread of covid never existed

Mercola: asymptomatic people do not diffuse “covid 19”

Commentary of the day – From “Doctor big pharma”:

That’s right, you can’t pass a disease that you don’t have, and you can’t get a disease that doesn’t make people sick. You also cannot have illness and have no symptoms.

As for the “incubation periods” during which someone would be infected but don’t know it yet until they really get sick?

Well I wonder how Homo Sapiens has managed all these millennia without vaccines, masks, staying at home, lockout….

If what the corrupt medical establishment, the corrupt politicians, the corrupt media, the corrupt “authorities” were right about what they say, there will be no human being on earth for centuries.

The Black Death was a real pandemic. What we have here is a scam.

#myth #asymptomatic #cases #RESISTANCE

Fox News anchor Chris Wallace hits out at Ted Cruz for throwing his daughters ‘under the bus’

Un moment de Martin Niemöller – R FOR RESISTANCE