in ,

The second Nuremberg tribunal is prepared

A second Nuremberg tribunal has been prepared with a class action lawsuit .

.

Reiner Fuellmich is the lawyer who managed to co-convict auto giant Volkswagen over its modified catalytic converters.

And it is the same lawyer who succeeded in convicting  Deutsche Bank , who agreed to pay over $ 130 million to solve / buy out the case due to corrupt practices abroad .

Covid-19 has become the fraud case of the century

According to Reiner Fuellmich, all the frauds committed by German companies are nothing compared to the damage this Covid-19 scam has caused and continues to cause.

Therefore, an international network of business lawyers will plead the greatest tort case of all time namely the Covid-19 fraud scandal which has since become the the biggest crime against humanity never.

I’m also one of four members of the German Corona Investigative Committee. Since
July 10, 2020, this Committee has been listening to a large number of international
scientists’ and experts’ testimony to find answers to questions about the corona
crisis, which more and more people worldwide are asking.

This corona crisis, according to all we know today, must be renamed a “Corona
Scandal” and those responsible for it must be criminally prosecuted and sued for civil
damages.

On a political level, everything must be done to make sure that no one will
ever again be in a position of such power as to be able to defraud humanity or to
attempt to manipulate us with their corrupt agendas.

Crimes against humanity were first defined in connection with the Nuremberg trials
after World War II, that is, when they dealt with the main war criminals of the Third
Reich.

Crimes against humanity are today regulated in section 7 of the International
Criminal Code.

The three major questions to be answered in the context of a judicial
approach to the corona scandal are:

1. Is there a corona pandemic or is there only a PCR-test pandemic?
Specifically, does a positive PCR-test result mean that the person tested is
infected with Covid-19, or does it mean absolutely nothing in connection with
the Covid-19 infection?

2. Do the so-called anti-corona measures, such as the lockdown, mandatory face
masks, social distancing, and quarantine regulations, serve to protect the
world’s population from corona, or do these measures serve only to make
people panic so that they believe – without asking any questions – that their
lives are in danger, so that in the end the pharmaceutical and tech industries
can generate huge profits from the sale of PCR tests, antigen and antibody
tests and vaccines, as well as the harvesting of our genetic fingerprints?

3. Is it true that the German government was massively lobbied, more so than
any other country, by the chief protagonists of this so-called corona pandemic,
Mr. Drosten, virologist at charity hospital in Berlin; Mr. Wieler, veterinarian and
head of the German equivalent of the CDC, the RKI; and Mr. Tedros, Head of
the World Health Organization or WHO; because Germany is known as a
particularly disciplined country and was therefore to become a role model for
the rest of the world for its strict and, of course, successful adherence to the
corona measures?

Answers to these three questions are urgently needed because the allegedly new
and highly dangerous coronavirus has not caused any excess mortality anywhere in
the world, and certainly not here in Germany.

But the anti-corona measures, whose only basis are the PCR-test results, which are in turn all based on the German Drosten test, have, in the meantime, caused the loss of innumerable human lives and have destroyed the economic existence of countless companies and individuals worldwide.

In Australia, for example, people are thrown into prison if they do not wear
a mask or do not wear it properly, as deemed by the authorities.

In the Philippines, people who do not wear a mask or do not wear it properly, in this sense, are getting shot in the head.

Summary of the facts

So what happened here regarding the alleged corona
pandemic?

The facts laid out below are, to a large extent, the result of the work of the Corona
Investigative Committee. This Committee was founded on July 10, 2020 by four
lawyers in order to determine, through hearing expert testimony of international
scientists and other experts:

1. How dangerous is the virus really?
2. What is the significance of a positive PCR test?
3. What collateral damage has been caused by the corona measures, both with
respect to the world population’s health, and with respect to the world’s
economy?

Let me start with a little bit of background information. What happened in May 2019
and then in early 2020? And what happened 12 years earlier with the swine flu,
which many of you may have forgotten about?

In May 2019, the stronger of the two parties which govern Germany in a grand coalition, the CDU, held a Congress on
Global Health, apparently at the instigation of important players from the
pharmaceutical industry and the tech industry.

At this Congress, the usual suspects,
you might say, gave their speeches. Angela Merkel was there, and the German
Secretary of Health, Jens Spahn.

But, some other people, whom one would not
necessarily expect to be present at such a gathering, were also there:

Professor
Drosten, virologist from the Charite hospital in Berlin;

Professor Wieler, veterinarian
and Head of the RKI, the German equivalent of the CDC;

Mr. Tedros,
philosopher and Head of the World Health Organization (WHO).

Also present and giving speeches were the chief lobbyists of the
world’s two largest health , namely the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and
the Wellcome Trust.

Less than a year later, these very people called the shots in the
proclamation of the worldwide corona pandemic, made sure that PCR tests
were used to prove infections with Covid-19 all over the world, and are now
pushing for vaccines to be invented and sold worldwide.

These infections, or rather the positive test results that the PCR tests
delivered, in turn became the justification for worldwide lockdowns, social
distancing and mandatory face masks.

It is important to note at this point that the definition of a pandemic was changed 12 years earlier.

Until then, a pandemic was
considered to be a disease that spread worldwide and which led to many serious
illnesses and deaths.

Suddenly, and for reasons never explained, it was supposed to
be a worldwide disease only. Many serious illnesses and many deaths were not
required any more to announce a pandemic.

Due to this change, the WHO, which is
closely intertwined with the global pharmaceutical industry, was able to declare the
swine flu pandemic in 2009, with the result that vaccines were produced and sold
worldwide on the basis of contracts that have been kept secret until today.

These vaccines proved to be completely unnecessary because the swine flu
eventually out to be a mild flu, and never became the horrific plague that the
pharmaceutical industry and its affiliated universities kept announcing it would turn
into, with millions of deaths certain to happen if people didn’t get vaccinated.

These
vaccines also led to serious health problems. About 700 children in Europe fell
incurably ill with narcolepsy and are now forever severely disabled. The vaccines
bought with millions of taxpayers’ money had to be destroyed with even more
taxpayers’ money.

Already then, during the swine flu, the German virologist Drosten
was one of those who stirred up panic in the population, repeating over and over
again that the swine flu would claim many hundreds of thousands, even millions of
deaths all over the world.

In the end, it was mainly thanks to Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg
and his efforts as a member of the German Bundestag, and also a member of the
Council of Europe, that this hoax was brought to an end before it would lead to even
more serious consequences.

Fast forward to March of 2020, when the German Bundestag announced an
Epidemic Situation of National Importance, which is the German equivalent of a
pandemic in March of 2020 and, based on this, the lockdown with the suspension of
all essential constitutional rights for an unforeseeable time, there was only one single
opinion on which the Federal Government in Germany based its decision.

In an
outrageous of the universally accepted principle “audiatur et altera pars”,
which means that one must also hear the other side, the only person they listened to
was Mr. Drosten.

That is the very person whose horrific, panic-inducing prognoses had proved to be
catastrophically false 12 years earlier.

We know this because a whistleblower named
David Sieber, a member of the Green Party, told us about it. He did so first on August
29, 2020 in Berlin, in the context of an event at which Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. also
took part, and at which both men gave speeches.

And he did so afterwards in one of the sessions of our Corona Committee.

The reason he did this is that he had become increasingly sceptical about the official
narrative propagated by politicians and the mainstream media. He had therefore
undertaken an effort to find out about other scientists’ opinions and had found them
on the Internet.

There, he realized that there were a number of highly renowned
scientists who held a completely different opinion, which contradicted the horrific
prognoses of Mr. Drosten.

They assumed – and still do assume – that there was no
disease that went beyond the gravity of the seasonal flu, that the population had
already acquired cross- or T-cell immunity against this allegedly new virus, and that
there was therefore no reason for any special measures, and certainly not for
vaccinations.

These scientists include Professor John Ioannidis of Stanford University in
California, a specialist in statistics and epidemiology, as well as public health, and at
the same time the most quoted scientist in the world;

Professor Michael Levitt,
Nobel prize-winner for chemistry and also a biophysicist at Stanford University;

German professors Kary Mölling,

Sucharit Bhakti,

Klud Wittkowski,

Stefan Homburg;

and now many, many more scientists and doctors worldwide:

Dr. Mike Yeadon is the former Vice-President and
Scientific Director of Pfizer, one of the largest pharmaceutical companies in the
world. I will talk some more about him a little later.

At the end of March, beginning of April of 2020, Mr. Sieber to the leadership of
his Green Party with the knowledge he had accumulated, and suggested that they
present these other scientific opinions to the public and explain that, contrary to
Mr. Drosten’s doomsday prophecies, there was no reason for the public to panic.

Incidentally, Lord Sumption, who served as a judge at the British supreme court from
2012 to 2018, had done the very same thing at the very same time and had come to
the very same conclusion: that there was no factual basis for panic and no legal basis for the corona measures.

Likewise, the former President of the German federal
constitutional court expressed – albeit more cautiously – serious doubts that the
corona measures were constitutional.

But instead of taking note of these other
opinions and discussing them with David Sieber, the Green Party leadership declared
that Mr. Drosten’s panic messages were good enough for the Green Party.

Remember, they’re not a member of the ruling coalition; they’re the opposition. Still,
that was enough for them, just as it had been good enough for the Federal
Government as a basis for its lockdown decision, they said.

They subsequently, the Green Party leadership called David Sieber a conspiracy theorist, without ever having considered the content of his information, and then stripped him of his mandates.

Now let’s take a look at the current actual situation regarding the virus’s danger, the
complete uselessness of PCR tests for the detection of infections, and the lockdowns
based on non-existent infections.

In the meantime, we know that the health care
systems were never in danger of becoming overwhelmed by Covid-19. On the
contrary, many hospitals remain empty to this day and some are now facing
bankruptcy.

The hospital ship Comfort, which anchored in New York at the time, and
could have accommodated a thousand patients, never accommodated more than
some 20 patients. Nowhere was there any excess mortality.

Studies carried out by
Professor Ioannidis and others have shown that the mortality of corona is equivalent
to that of the seasonal flu. Even the pictures from Bergamo and New York that were
used to demonstrate to the world that panic was in order proved to be deliberately
misleading.

Then, the so-called “Panic Paper” was leaked, which was written by the German
Department of the Interior. Its classified content shows beyond a shadow of a doubt
that, in fact, the population was deliberately driven to panic by politicians and
mainstream media.

The accompanying irresponsible statements of the Head of the
RKI – remember the [German] CDC – Mr. Wieler, who repeatedly and excitedly
announced that the corona measures must be followed unconditionally by the
population without them asking any question, shows that that he followed the script
verbatim.

In his public statements, he kept announcing that the situation was very
grave and threatening, although the figures compiled by his own Institute proved the
exact opposite.

Among other things, the “Panic Paper” calls for children to be made to feel
responsible – and I quote – “for the painful tortured death of their parents and
grandparents if they do not follow the corona rules”, that is, if they do not wash their
hands constantly and don’t stay away from their grandparents.

A word of clarification:
in Bergamo, the vast majority of deaths, 94% to be exact, out to be the result
not of Covid-19, but rather the consequence of the government deciding to transfer
sick patients, sick with probably the cold or seasonal flu, from hospitals to nursing
homes in order to make room at the hospitals for all the Covid patients, who
ultimately never arrived.

There, at the nursing homes, they then infected old people
with a severely weakened immune system, usually as a result of pre-existing medical
conditions.

In addition, a flu vaccination, which had previously been administered,
had further weakened the immune systems of the people in the nursing homes.

In
New York, only some, but by far not all hospitals were overwhelmed. Many people,
most of whom were again elderly and had serious pre-existing medical conditions,
and most of whom, had it not been for the panic-mongering, would have just stayed
at home to recover, raced to the hospitals.

There, many of them fell victim to
healthcare-associated infections (or nosocomial infections) on the one hand, and
incidents of malpractice on the other hand, for example, by being put on a respirator
rather than receiving oxygen through an oxygen mask.

Again, to clarify: Covid-19,
this is the current state of affairs, is a dangerous disease, just like the seasonal flu is
a dangerous disease. And of course, Covid-19, just like the seasonal flu, may
sometimes take take a severe clinical course and will sometimes kill patients.

However, as autopsies have shown, which were carried out in Germany in particular,
by the forensic scientist Professor Klaus Püschel in Hamburg, the fatalities he
examined had almost all been caused by serious pre-existing conditions, and almost
all of the people who had died had died at the very at a very old age, just like in Italy,
meaning they had lived beyond their average life expectancy.

In this context, the following should also be mentioned: the German RKI – that is,
again the equivalent of the CDC – had initially, strangely enough, recommended that
no autopsies be performed.

There are numerous credible reports that doctors
and hospitals worldwide had been paid money for declaring a deceased person a
victim of Covid-19 rather than writing down the true cause of death on the death
certificate, for example a heart attack or a gunshot wound.

Without the autopsies, we
would never know that the overwhelming majority of the alleged Covid-19 victims had
died of completely different diseases, but not of Covid-19.

The assertion that the
lockdown was necessary because there were so many different infections with
SARS-COV-2, and because the healthcare systems would be overwhelmed is wrong
for three reasons, as we have learned from the hearings we conducted with the
Corona Committee, and from other data that has become available in the meantime:

A. The lockdown was imposed when the virus was already retreating. By the time the
lockdown was imposed, the alleged infection rates were already dropping again.

B. There’s already protection from the virus because of cross- or T-cell immunity.

Apart from the above mentioned lockdown being imposed when the infection rates
were already dropping, there is also cross- or T-cell immunity in the general
population against the corona viruses contained in every flu or influenza wave.

This is true, even if this time around, a slightly different strain of the coronavirus was at work.That is because the body’s own immune system remembers every virus it has
ever battled in the past, and from this experience, it also recognizes a supposedly
new, but still similar, strain of the virus from the corona family.

Incidentally, that’s how the PCR test for the detection of an infection was invented by now infamous Professor Drosten.

At the beginning of January of 2020, based on this very basic knowledge,
Mr. Drosten developed his PCR test, which supposedly detects an infection with
SARS-COV-2, without ever having seen the real Wuhan virus from China.

Only having learned from social media reports that there was something going on in
Wuhan, he started tinkering on his computer with what would become his corona
PCR test.

For this, he used an old SARS virus, hoping it would be sufficiently similar
to the allegedly new strain of the coronavirus found in Wuhan. Then, he sent the
result of his computer tinkering to China to determine whether the victims of the
alleged new coronavirus tested positive. They did.

And that was enough for the World Health Organization to sound the pandemic alarm
and to recommend the worldwide use of the Drosten PCR test for the detection of
infections with the virus now called SARS-COV-2.

Drosten’s opinion and advice was
– this must be emphasized once again – the only source for the German government
when it announced the lockdown as well as the rules for social distancing and the
mandatory wearing of masks.

– this must also be emphasized once again –
Germany apparently became the center of especially massive lobbying by the
pharmaceutical and tech industry because the world, with reference to the allegedly
disciplined Germans, should do as the Germans do in order to the pandemic.

The most important part of our fact-finding: the PCR test is being used
on the basis of false statements, NOT based on scientific facts with respect to
infections.

In the meantime, we have learned that these PCR tests, contrary to the
assertions of Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, do NOT give any indication of
an infection with any virus, let alone an infection with SARS-COV-2.

Not only are
PCR tests expressly not approved for diagnostic purposes, as is correctly noted on
leaflets coming with these tests, and as the inventor of the PCR test, Kary Mullis, has
repeatedly emphasized.

Instead, they’re simply incapable of diagnosing any disease.

That is: contrary to the assertions of Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, which they have
been making since the proclamation of the pandemic, a positive PCR-test result does
not mean that an infection is present.

If someone tests positive, it does NOT mean
that they’re infected with anything, let alone with the contagious SARS-COV-2 virus.

Even the United States CDC, even this institution agrees with this, and I quote
directly from page 38 of one of its publications on the coronavirus and the PCR tests,
dated July 13, 2020.

First bullet point says:
“Detection of viral RNA may not indicate the presence of infectious virus or that 2019
nCOV [novel coronavirus] is the causative agent for clinical symptoms.”

Second bullet point says:
“The of this test has not been established for monitoring treatment of
2019 nCOV infection.”

Third bullet point says: “This test cannot rule out diseases
caused by other bacterial or viral pathogens.”

It is still not clear whether there has ever been a scientifically correct isolation
of the Wuhan virus, so that nobody knows exactly what we’re looking for when we
test, especially since this virus, just like the flu viruses, mutates quickly.

The PCR
swabs take one or two sequences of a molecule that are invisible to the human
eye and therefore need to be amplified in many cycles to make it visible.

Everything over 35 cycles is – as reported by the New York Times and others –
considered completely unreliable and scientifically unjustifiable.

However, the
Drosten test, as well as the WHO-recommended tests that followed his
example, are set to 45 cycles.

Can that be because of the desire to produce as
many positive results as possible and thereby provide the basis for the false
assumption that a large number of infections have been detected?

The test cannot distinguish inactive and reproductive matter. That means that a
positive result may happen because the test detects, for example, a piece of
debris, a fragment of a molecule, which may signal nothing else than that the
immune system of the person tested won a battle with a common cold in the
past.

Even Drosten himself declared in an interview with a German business
magazine in 2014, at that time concerning the alleged detection of an infection with
the MERS virus, allegedly with the help of the PCR test, that these PCR tests are so
highly sensitive that even very healthy and non-infectious people may test positive.

At
that time, he also became very much aware of the powerful role of a panic and fearmongering media, as you’ll see at the end of the following quote.

He said then, in this
interview: “If, for example, such a pathogen scurries over the nasal mucosa of a
nurse for a day or so without her getting sick or noticing anything, then she’s
suddenly a MERS case. This could also explain the explosion of case numbers in
Saudi Arabia. In addition, the media there have made this into an incredible
sensation.”

Has he forgotten this? Or is he deliberately concealing this in the corona context
because corona is a very lucrative business opportunity for the pharmaceutical
industry as a whole?

And for Mr. Alford Lund, his co-author in many studies and also
a PCR-test producer. In my view, it is completely implausible that he forgot in 2020
what he knew about the PCR tests and told the business magazine in 2014.

In short, this test cannot detect any infection, contrary to all false claims stating that it
can. An infection, a so-called “hot” infection, requires that the virus, or rather a
fragment of a molecule which may be a virus, is not just found somewhere, for
example, in the throat of a person without causing any damage – that would be a
“cold” infection.

Rather, a “hot” infection requires that the virus penetrates into the
cells, replicates there and causes symptoms such as headaches or a sore throat.

Only then is a person really infected in the sense of a “hot” infection, because only
then is a person contagious, that is, able to infect others. Until then, it is completely
harmless for both the host and all other people that the host comes into contact with.

Once again, this means that positive test results, contrary to all other claims by
Drosten, Wieler, or the WHO, mean nothing with respect to infections, as even the
CDC knows, as quoted above.

Meanwhile, a number of highly respected scientists worldwide assume that there has
never been a corona pandemic, but only a PCR-test pandemic.

This is the
conclusion reached by many German scientists, such as professors Bhakti, Reiss,
Mölling, Hockertz, Walach and many others, including the above-mentioned
Professor John Ioannidis, and the Nobel laureate, Professor Michael Levitt from
Stanford University.

The most recent such opinion is that of the aforementioned Dr. Mike Yeadon, a
former Vice-President and Chief Science Officer at Pfizer, who held this position for
16 years.

He and his co-authors, all well-known scientists, published a scientific
paper in September of 2020 and he wrote a corresponding magazine article on
September 20, 2020.

Among other things, he and they state – and I quote:

“We’re basing our government , our economic , and the of
restricting fundamental rights, presumably on completely wrong data and
assumptions about the coronavirus.

If it weren’t for the test results that are constantly
reported in the media, the pandemic would be over because nothing really
happened.

Of course, there are some serious individual cases of illness, but there
are also some in every flu epidemic. There was a real wave of disease in March and
April, but since then, everything has gone back to normal.

Only the positive results
rise and sink wildly again and again, depending on how many tests are carried out.
But the real cases of illnesses are over. There can be no talk of a second wave. The
allegedly new strain of the coronavirus is …”
– Dr. Yeadon continues –
“… only new in that it is a new type of the -known corona virus.

There are at least
four coronaviruses that are endemic and cause some of the common colds we
experience, especially in winter. They all have a striking sequence similarity to the
coronavirus, and because the human immune system recognizes the similarity to the
virus that has now allegedly been newly discovered, a T-cell immunity has
existed in this respect. 30 per cent of the population had this before the allegedly new
virus even appeared.

Therefore, it is sufficient for the so-called herd immunity that 15
to 25 per cent of the population are infected with the allegedly new coronavirus to
stop the further spread of the virus.

And this has been the case.”
Regarding the all-important PCR tests, Yeadon writes, in a piece called “Lies,
Damned Lies and Health Statistics: The Deadly Danger of False Positives”, dated
September 20, 2020, and I quote
“The likelihood of an apparently positive case being a false positive is between 89 to
94 per cent, or near certainty.”

Dr. Yeadon, in agreement with the professors of immunology Kamera from Germany,
Kappel from the Netherlands, and Cahill from Ireland, as well as the microbiologist
Dr. Arve from Austria, all of whom testified before the German Corona Committee,
explicitly points out that a positive test does not mean that an intact virus has been
found.

The authors explain that what the PCR test actually measures is – and I quote:
“Simply the presence of partial RNA sequences present in the intact virus, which
could be a piece of dead virus, which cannot make the subject sick, and cannot be
transmitted, and cannot make anyone else sick.”

Because of the complete unsuitability of the test for the detection of infectious
diseases – tested positive in goats, sheep, papayas and even chicken wings –
Oxford Professor Carl Heneghan, Director of the Centre for Evidence-Based
Medicine, writes that the Covid virus would never disappear if this test practice were
to be continued, but would always be falsely detected in much of what is tested.

Lockdowns, as Yeadon and his colleagues found out, do not work. Sweden, with its
laissez-faire approach, and Great Britain, with its strict lockdown, for example, have
completely comparable disease and mortality statistics.

The same was found by US
scientists concerning the different US states. It makes no difference to the incidence
of disease whether a state implements a lockdown or not.

With regard to the now infamous Imperial College of London’s Professor Neil
Ferguson and his completely false computer models warning of millions of deaths, he
says that – and I quote: “No serious scientist gives any validity to Ferguson’s model.”
He points out with thinly veiled contempt – again I quote:
“It’s important that you know, most scientists don’t accept that it …” – that is,
Ferguson’s model – “was even faintly right.

But the government is still wedded to the
model.” Ferguson predicted 40 thousand corona deaths in Sweden by May and 100
thousand by June, but it remained at 5,800 which, according to the Swedish
authorities, is equivalent to a mild flu.

If the PCR tests had not been used as a
diagnostic tool for corona infections, there would not be a pandemic and there would
be no lockdowns, but everything would have been perceived as just a medium or
light wave of influenza, these scientists conclude. Dr. Yeadon in his piece, “Lies,
Damned Lies and Health Statistics:

The Deadly Danger of False Positives, writes:
“This test is fatally flawed and must immediately be withdrawn and never used again
in this setting, unless shown to be fixed.” And, towards the end of that article, “I have
explained how a hopelessly performing diagnostic test has been, and continues to be
used, not for diagnosis of disease, but it seems solely to create fear”.

Severe damage
caused by the lockdowns and other measures.

Another detailed paper, written by a
German official in the Department of the Interior, who is responsible for risk
assessment and the protection of the population against risks, was leaked recently.

It
is now called the “False Alarm” paper. This paper comes to the conclusion that there
was that there was and is no sufficient evidence for serious health risks for the
population as claimed by Drosten, Wieler and the WHO, but – the author says
– there’s very much evidence of the corona measures causing gigantic health and
economic damage to the population, which he then describes in detail in this paper.

This, he concludes, will lead to very high claims for damages, which the government
will be held responsible for. This has now become reality, but the paper’s author was
suspended.

More and more scientists, but also lawyers, recognize that, as a result of the
deliberate panic-mongering, and the corona measures enabled by this panic,
democracy is in great danger of being replaced by fascist totalitarian models.

As I
already mentioned above, in Australia, people who do not wear the masks, which
more and more studies show, are hazardous to health, or who allegedly do not wear
them correctly, are arrested, handcuffed and thrown into .

In the Philippines, they
run the risk of getting shot, but even in Germany and in other previously civilized
countries, children are taken away from their parents if they do not comply with
quarantine regulations, distance regulations, and mask-wearing regulations.

According to psychologists and psychotherapists who testified before the Corona
Committee, children are traumatized en masse, with the worst psychological
consequences yet to be expected in the medium- and -term.

In Germany alone,
bankruptcies are expected in the fall to strike small- and medium-sized
businesses, which form the backbone of the economy.

This will result in incalculable
tax losses and incalculably high and long-term social security money transfers for –
among other things – unemployment benefits.

Since, in the meantime, pretty much everybody is beginning to understand the full
devastating impact of the completely unfounded corona measures, I will refrain from
detailing this any further.

Summary of the legal consequences.

The most difficult part of
a lawyer’s work is always to establish the true facts, not the application of the legal
rules to these facts. Unfortunately, a German lawyer does not learn this at law school
but his Anglo-American counterparts do get the necessary training for this at their law
schools.

And probably for this reason, but also because of the much more
pronounced independence of the Anglo-American judiciary, the Anglo-American law
of evidence is much more effective in practice than the German one.

A court of law
can only decide a legal dispute correctly if it has previously determined the facts
correctly, which is not possible without looking at all the evidence.

And that’s why the
law of evidence is so important. On the basis of the facts summarized above, in
particular those established with the help of the work of the German Corona
Committee, the legal evaluation is actually simple.

It is simple for all civilized legal
systems, regardless of whether these legal systems are based on civil law, which
follows the Roman law more closely, or whether they are based on Anglo-American
common law, which is only loosely connected to Roman law.

Let’s first take a look at the unconstitutionality of the measures. A number of German
law professors, including professors Kingreen, Morswig, Jungbluth and Vosgerau
have stated, either in written expert opinions or in interviews, in line with the serious
doubts expressed by the former president of the federal constitutional court with
respect to the constitutionality of the corona measures, that these measures – the
corona measures – are without a sufficient factual basis, and also without a sufficient
legal basis, and are therefore unconstitutional and must be repealed immediately.

Very recently, a judge, Thorsten Schleif is his name, declared publicly that the
German judiciary, just like the general public, has been so panic-stricken that it was
no longer able to administer justice properly.

He says that the of law – and I
quote – “have all too quickly waved through coercive measures which, for millions of
people all over Germany, represent massive suspensions of their constitutional
rights.

He points out that German citizens – again I quote – “are currently
experiencing the most serious encroachment on their constitutional rights since the
founding of the federal republic of Germany in 1949”.

In order to contain the corona
pandemic, federal and state governments have intervened, he says, massively, and
in part threatening the very existence of the country as it is guaranteed by the
constitutional rights of the people.

What about fraud, intentional infliction of damage and crimes against humanity?

Based on the rules of criminal law, asserting false facts concerning the PCR tests
or intentional misrepresentation, as it was committed by Messrs. Drosten, Wieler
and WHO, as well as the WHO, can only be assessed as fraud.

Based on the rules of
civil tort law, this translates into intentional infliction of damage.

The German
professor of civil law, Martin Schwab, supports this finding in public interviews. In a
comprehensive legal opinion of around 180 pages, he has familiarized himself with
the subject matter like no other legal scholar has done thus far and, in particular, has
provided a detailed account of the complete failure of the mainstream media to report
on the true facts of this so-called pandemic.

Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and Tedros of
the WHO all knew, based on their own expertise or the expertise of their institutions,
that the PCR tests cannot provide any information about infections, but asserted over
and over again to the general public that they can, with their counterparts all over the
world repeating this.

They all knew and accepted that, on the basis of their
recommendations, the governments of the world would decide on lockdowns, the
rules for social distancing, and mandatory wearing of masks, the latter representing a
very serious health hazard, as more and more independent studies and expert
statements show.

Under the rules of civil tort law, all those who have been harmed by
these PCR-test-induced lockdowns are entitled to receive full compensation for their
losses. In particular, there is a duty to compensate – that is, a duty to pay damages
for the loss of profits suffered by companies and self-employed employed persons as
a result of the lockdown and other measures.

In the meantime, however, the anti-corona measures have caused, and continue to
cause, such devastating damage to the world population’s health and economy that
the crimes committed by Messrs. Drosten, Wieler and the WHO must be legally
qualified as actual crimes against humanity, as defined in section 7 of the
International Criminal Code.

How can we do something? What can we do?

Well, the class action is the best route
to compensatory damages and to political consequences. The so-called class action
lawsuit is based on English law and exists today in the USA and in Canada.

It
enables a court of law to allow a complaint for damages to be tried as a class action
lawsuit at the request of a plaintiff if:

1. As a result of a damage-inducing event …

2. A large number of people suffer the same type of damage.

Phrased differently, a judge can allow a class-action lawsuit to go forward if common
questions of law and fact make up the vital component of the lawsuit.

Here, the
common questions of law and fact revolve around the worldwide PCR-test-based
lockdowns and its consequences.

Just like the VW diesel passenger cars were
functioning products, but they were defective due to a so-called defeat device
because they didn’t comply with the emissions standards, so too the PCR tests –
which are perfectly good products in other settings – are defective products when it
comes to the diagnosis of infections.

Now, if an American or Canadian company or
an American or Canadian individual decides to sue these persons in the United
States or Canada for damages, then the court called upon to resolve this dispute
may, upon request, allow this complaint to be tried as a class action lawsuit.

If this happens, all affected parties worldwide will be informed about this through
publications in the mainstream media and will thus have the opportunity to join this
class action within a certain period of time, to be determined by the court.

It should be
emphasized that nobody must join the class action, but every injured party can join
the class.
The advantage of the class action is that only one trial is needed, namely to try the
complaint of a representative plaintiff who is affected in a manner typical of everyone
else in the class.

This is, firstly, cheaper, and secondly, faster than hundreds of
thousands or more individual lawsuits. And thirdly, it imposes less of a burden on the
. Fourthly, as a rule it allows a much more precise examination of the
accusations than would be possible in the context of hundreds of thousands, or more
likely in this corona setting, even millions of individual lawsuits.

In particular, the well-established and proven Anglo-American law of evidence, with
its pre-trial discovery, is applicable. This requires that all evidence relevant for the
determination of the lawsuit is put on the table.

In contrast to the typical situation in
German lawsuits with structural imbalance, that is, lawsuits involving on the one hand
a consumer, and on the other hand a powerful corporation, the withholding or even
destruction of evidence is not without consequence; rather the party withholding or
even destroying evidence loses the case under these evidence rules.

Here in Germany, a group of tort lawyers have banded together to help their clients
with recovery of damages. They have provided all relevant information and forms for
German plaintiffs to both estimate how much damage they have suffered and join the
group or class of plaintiffs who will later join the class action when it goes forward
either in Canada or the US.

Initially, this group of lawyers had considered to also
collect and manage the claims for damages of other, non-German plaintiffs, but this
proved to be unmanageable.

However, through an international lawyers’ network, which is growing larger by the
day, the German group of attorneys provides to all of their colleagues in all other
countries, free of charge, all relevant information, including expert opinions and
testimonies of experts showing that the PCR tests cannot detect infections.

And they
also provide them with all relevant information as to how they can prepare and
bundle the claims for damages of their clients so that, they too, can assert their
clients’ claims for damages, either in their home country’s of law, or within the
framework of the class action, as explained above.

These scandalous corona facts, gathered mostly by the Corona Committee and
summarized above, are the very same facts that will soon be proven to be true either
in one court of law, or in many of law all over the world.

These are the facts that will pull the masks off the faces of all those responsible for
these crimes. To the politicians who believe those corrupt people, these facts are
hereby offered as a lifeline that can help you readjust your course of action, and start
the long overdue public scientific discussion, and not go down with those charlatans
and criminals.

Only in america

Pastor expels police from his church ” get out you Nazi’s “