Li-Meng Yan, a Chinese virologist (MD, PhD) who worked in a WHO reference laboratory and fled his post at the University of Hong Kong, released a second co-authored report, alleging that SARS -CoV-2, the virus that causes COVID-19, was not only created in a laboratory in Wuhan, it is an “unrestricted biological weapon” that was intentionally released.
“We used biological evidence and in-depth analyzes to show that SARS-CoV-2 must be a laboratory product, created by using a model virus (ZC45 / ZXC21) belonging to military research laboratories under the control of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) government, ”the newspaper read.
SARS-CoV2 is a laboratory modification product, which can be created in about six months using a model virus belonging to a laboratory of the People’s Liberation Army (PLA). The fact that fabrications of data were used to cover up the true origin of SARS-CoV 2 further implies that the laboratory modification here goes beyond simple gain-of-function research.
The scale and coordinated nature of this scientific fraud signifies the degree of corruption in the fields of academic research and public health. As a result of this corruption, damage has been done both to the reputation of the scientific community and to the well-being of the world community.
The report also claims that the RaTG13 virus that Wuhan “Batwoman” Dr. Zhengli Shi and colleagues say they obtained in bat droppings in 2013 (and which is 96% identical to SARS-CoV-2), is fraudulent and also the man made.
Since its publication, the RaTG13 virus served as foundational evidence for the theory that SARS-CoV-2 must have a natural origin. However, no live virus or an intact genome of RaTG13 has ever been isolated or recovered. Therefore, the only proof of the “existence” of RaTG13 in nature is its genomic sequence published on GenBank.
The report goes on to say that the RaTG13 genome could easily be made, and that “an entry on GenBank, which in this case equates to the existence of an assembled viral genomic sequence and its associated sequencing, is not definitive proof that this viral genome is correct or real” and that the process for DNA sequencing itself “leaves room for potential fraud”.
If one intends to build an RNA viral genome on GenBank, he or she could do it by following these steps: create its genomic sequence on a computer, synthesize segments of the genome according to the sequence, amplify each DNA segment by PCR, then send the PCR products (can also be mixed with genetic material derived from the suspected virus host to mimic an authentic sequencing sample) for sequencing.The resulting raw sequencing reads would be used, along with the genomic sequence created, to establish an entry on GenBank. Once completed, this entry would be accepted as proof of the natural existence of the corresponding virus. It is clear that a viral genomic sequence and its GenBank entry can be made if well planned.
RaTG13 has “ several abnormal characteristics ”, according to the report. For starters, it is claimed that this was a fecal sample – yet only 1.7% of raw sequencing reads are bacterial, while fecal swab samples are typically 70-90% bacterial. Second, RaTG13 genomic sequence contains segments of non-bat origin, including fox, flying fox, squirrel, and other animals.
What else, China destroyed all the evidence by RaTG13. “No independent verification of the RaTG13 sequence seems possible because, according to Dr. Zhengli Shi, the raw sample has been exhausted and no live virus has ever been isolated or recovered. In particular, this information was known very early on to a small circle of virologists and apparently accepted by them.
Meanwhile, another coronavirus that shares “100% nucleotide sequence identity with RaTG13” – RaBtCoV / 4991 – on a “440 bp RNA-dependent RNA polymerase short segment”.
RaBtCoV / 4991 was reportedly discovered by Shi and his colleagues in 2012 and published in 2016, and colleagues asked if it was the same virus as RaTG13.
Considering the 100% identity on this short gene segment between RaBtCoV / 4991 and RaTG13, the field requested clarification as to whether or not these two names refer to the same virus. However, Dr. Shi did not respond to the requester to answer this question for months. The answer finally came from Peter Daszak, president of the EcoHealth Alliance and longtime Shi collaborator, who claimed that RaBtCoV / 4991 was RaTG1327.
Three suspicious facts
First, it makes no sense that ‘Batwoman’ Shi and her team wouldn’t have led whole genome sequencing of RaBtCoV / 4991 before 2020, as suspected in the deaths of miners suffering from severe pneumonia after cleaning up bat droppings in a Chinese mine shaft.
Given the Shi group’s continued interest in studying SARS-like bat coronaviruses and the fact that RaBtCoV / 4991 is a SARS-like coronavirus with a possible link to the death of miners, it is highly unlikely that the Shi group will just sequence only a 440 bp segment of RdRp and not continue sequencing the region encoding the receptor binding motif (RBM) of the spike gene. In fact, spike gene sequencing is routinely attempted by the Shi group once the presence of a SARS-like bat coronavirus is confirmed by sequencing the 440 bp RdRp25,32 segment, although success of these efforts is often hampered by poor sample quality.
“Clearly, the perceptible motivation of the Shi group to study this RaBtCoV / 4991 virus and the fact that no sequencing of the genome of this one was carried out during a period of seven years (2013-2020) is difficult to reconcile and to explain.“
Meanwhile, genomic sequencing of RaTG13 was carried out in 2018.
Second, why Shi delay publication on RaTG13 until 2020 when it has a Spike protein that can bind to human ACE2 receptors?
… If the genomic sequence of RaTG13 was available since 2018, This virus, which has a possible link to the deaths of miners in 2012 and has an alarming SARS-like RBM, is unlikely to be kept for two years without publication.. In accordance with this analysis, a recent study indeed proved that the RBD of RaTG13 (produced by gene synthesis based on its published sequence) was able to bind to hACE2
Third, there was no follow-up work on RaTG13 by Shi’s group.
After obtaining the genomic sequence of a SARS-like bat coronavirus, the Shi group regularly studies whether or not the virus is capable of infecting human cells. This model of research activity has been demonstrated time and time again. however, such a scheme is not seen here despite the fact that RaTG13 has an interesting RBM and is allegedly the closest match to the course of SARS-CoV-2
Direct genetic evidence proving that RaTG13 is fraudulent
Yan group take a close look at specific spike protein sequences for relevant viruses – by specifically comparing mutations, and found that the peak genes of SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 do not contain evidence of a natural evolution from other coronaviruses which naturally evolved.
A logical interpretation of this observation is that SARS-CoV-2 and RaTG13 could not be linked to each other by natural evolution and at least one must be artificialIf one is the product of natural evolution, then the other should not be. It is also possible that none of them exist naturally.. If RaTG13 is a real virus that really exists in nature, then SARS-CoV-2 must be man-made.
It is very likely that the RaTG13 genome sequence was made by slightly modifying the SARS-CoV-2 sequence to achieve an overall sequence identity of 96.2%.. During this process, much of the editing must have been done for the RBM region of the S1 / peak as the encoded RBM determines the interaction with ACE2 and therefore would be heavily scrutinized by others.
The article concludes: All manufactured coronaviruses share 100% amino acid sequence identity on protein E with ZC45 and ZXC21
The evidence presented here clearly indicates that the new coronaviruses recently released by the CCP-controlled labs are all fraudulent and do not exist in nature. A final proof of this conclusion is the fact that all of these viruses share 100% amino acid sequence identity on protein E with the bat coronaviruses ZC45 and ZXC21, which, as stated in our previous report1, should be the template / backbone used for the creation of SARS-CoV-2. Despite its conserved function in the viral replication cycle, protein E is tolerant and permissive to amino acid mutations. It is therefore impossible for the amino acid sequence of protein E to remain unchanged when the virus has crossed the species barrier several times. (between different species of bats, from bats to pangolins, and from pangolins to humans). The 100% identity observed here therefore further proves that the sequences of these newly published new coronaviruses have been fabricated.
Unlimited Biological Weapon?
Yan notes that while it is not easy for the public to accept that SARS-CoV-2 is a biological weapon due to its relatively low lethality, it indeed meets the criteria of a biological weapon.
In 2005, Dr Yang clarified the criteria for a pathogen to qualify as a biological weapon:
- It is significantly virulent and can cause large-scale losses.
- It is very contagious and is easily transmitted, often through the respiratory tract in aerosol form. The most dangerous scenario would be that it allows human-to-human transmission.
- It is relatively resistant to environmental changes, can support transport and is able to support targeted release.
All of the above have been met by SARS-CoV-2: it claimed the lives of hundreds of thousands of people, led to many hospitalizations and left many sequelae and complications; it spreads easily by contact, droplets and aerosols via the respiratory tract and is able to be transmitted from person to person, the latter being initially covered by the CCP government and WHO and was first revealed by Dr Li-Meng Yan on January 19, 2020 on Lude Press; it is insensitive to temperature (unlike seasonal flu) and remains viable for a long time on many surfaces and at 4 ° C (eg ice / water mixture).
What else, COVID-19 spreads asymptomatically, which “makes the control of SARS-CoV-2 extremely difficult”.
“In addition, the transmissibility, morbidity and mortality of SARS-CoV-2 has also resulted in panic in the global community, disruption of social orders and decimation of the global economy. The reach and destructive power of SARS-CoV-2 are both unprecedented.“
“Clearly, SARS-CoV-2 not only meets the standards of a traditional bioweapon, but also exceeds them. Therefore, it should be defined as an unrestricted biological weapon. “
#Whistleblower #publishes #article #alleging #largescale #organized #scientific #fraud #Dateway