I covered the dangers of the vaccine. Now I want to show why it is ineffective, even assuming the basic theory of vaccination is valid.
Peter Doshi, associate editor of the medical journal BMJ, and Eric Topol, professor of molecular medicine at Scripps Research, wrote a devastating NY Times opinion piece on clinical trials of the COVID vaccine.
They revealed the fatal flaw in the major Pfizer, AstraZeneca and Moderna trials.
September 22, The Times: “These coronavirus trials don’t answer the only question we need to know”:
“If you were to approve a vaccine for the coronavirus, would you approve one that you only knew people protected against the milder form of Covid-19, or that would prevent its severe complications?”
“The answer is obvious. You would like to protect yourself against the worst cases. “
“But that’s not how the companies testing three of the top coronavirus vaccine candidates, Moderna, Pfizer and AstraZeneca, whose US trial is pending, approach the problem.”
“According to their study protocols, which they published at the end of last week, a vaccine could meet companies’ criteria for success if it reduced the risk of mild Covid-19, but it has never been shown to reduce moderate or severe forms of the disease. , or the risk of hospitalization, intensive care unit admissions or death. “
“Saying that a vaccine works should mean that most people are no longer at risk of becoming seriously ill. This is not what these tests will determine. “
This means that these clinical trials were dead in the water.
The trials were designed to show their effectiveness in preventing mild cases of COVID – cough or chills and fever – that no one should worry about, because mild cases naturally run their course and cause no harm. THERE IS NO NEED FOR A VACCINE THAT PREVENTS MILD CASES.
I will now explain to you WHY clinical trials were only designed to show that the vaccine could prevent mild cases.
Vaccine makers assume the SARS-CoV-2 virus is everywhere. So, during a clinical trial, the virus will descend from the clouds and infect a number of volunteers in the trial.
All of these volunteers are in good health. They are neither old nor fragile. They have already been screened for and eliminated if they have a history of severe allergies.
So when the SARS-CoV-2 virus attacks a few of these healthy volunteers, what are the chances that it will cause severe cases of pneumonia, requiring hospitalization?
The odds are VERY long against.
How long do you think vaccine makers should wait before, say, 150 of healthy volunteers get severe pneumonia?
Five years? Ten? Forever?
Pfizer is not going to sit there and wait and wait and wait. Are you kidding?
No, they’re only going to wait for 150 volunteers (the predetermined magic number) to come down with a cough or simple chills and fever – a mild case of COVID.
Then they will stop the clinical trial.
Then they’ll see how many of those 150 mild cases occurred in people who received the vaccine, and how many cases occurred in people who received the saltwater placebo vaccine.
This is how they discover the effectiveness of the vaccine.
And indeed, according to Pfizer, most cases have occurred in volunteers who received the salt water placebo vaccine.
Therefore, Pfizer could claim that the vaccine was effective in protecting against coughs, chills and fever. Mild cases of COVID.
That’s ALL Pfizer could say.
And that is why the clinical trials were unsuccessful. Because the trials were only set up to show prevention of mild cases – which no one should care about.
I could go on and explain how vaccine makers could fake even this pointless claim, but I’ll leave it at that.
The COVID vaccine is designed not to prevent anything important or significant.
All the glowing reviews of the vaccine, the gossip about a historic breakthrough, the celebrations – utter and utter nonsense.
This article first appeared on NoMoreFakeNews.com.
The forced inoculation is here
#shouldnt #COVID #vaccine #working #Dateway